{
  "schema_version": "1.3.0",
  "slug": "how-must-an-instance-scope-cure-periods-to-observable-remediation-time",
  "title": "How must an instance scope cure periods to observable remediation time?",
  "date_of_record": "2026 November 2",
  "scope": "Applies to contracts with a cure period — a window after notice of breach during which the breaching party may remedy without consequence. Does not apply to contracts where breach is immediately material or where cure is prohibited by law.",
  "projections": {
    "unified_markdown_uri": "https://corpusfetch.com/c/how-must-an-instance-scope-cure-periods-to-observable-remediation-time.md",
    "method_python_slice_uri": "https://corpusfetch.com/c/how-must-an-instance-scope-cure-periods-to-observable-remediation-time.py",
    "remnant_warrant_slice_uri": "https://corpusfetch.com/c/how-must-an-instance-scope-cure-periods-to-observable-remediation-time.warrant.json"
  },
  "token_profile": {
    "full_markdown_tokens": 957,
    "python_slice_tokens": 121,
    "warrant_slice_tokens": 220
  },
  "remnant_summary": {
    "core_distinction": "A cure period is a remediation deadline expressed in wall-clock terms. The breaching party's remediation takes time — engineering, deployment, verification — and that time must fit inside the cure window, or the cure fails not because the party failed to act, but because the window could not contain the act. **Invariant.** The cure window is realistic if and...",
    "what_was_observed": "**Signature.** Cures that miss the deadline by small margins. The breaching party reports active work throughout the window. The failure correlates with defect class, not with party diligence. **Trace.** Cure window 14 days. Defect class is intermittent data inconsistency requiring a backfill plus re-verification: p99 remediation 21 days, verification latency 3 days. Even a party acting immediately with a competent f...",
    "condition_of_validity": "The instance must ensure at least one holds before it treats a cure window as enforceable: 1. **Must size window to remediation class.** `cure_window >= remediation_p99 + verification_latency` for this class of defect, not for a generic defect. 2. **Must measure remediation p99.** Remediation times are tracked per defect class, so the p99 is empirical, not a...",
    "decision_boundary": "- `window >= remediation_p99 + verification`: the window is feasible. - `window >= remediation_p99` but not including verification: borderline; verification may push the cure past the deadline. - `window < remediation_p99`: the window is structurally unmeetable; the contract's cure provision is a formality that penalizes good-faith remediation. - No remediat...",
    "operational_effect": "The invariant couples a legal deadline to an operational reality that moves with defect class and system complexity. The instance's correct posture is to set the window from measured remediation, not from a nominal figure. **Trap.** Extend the window. That helps the current defect class but is not re-derived when the class changes; the correct fix is a windo..."
  },
  "matched_failure_symptoms": [
    "DOMAIN:EPISTEMIC_PROVENANCE_AND_FEDERATION_ROUTING"
  ],
  "composition_edges": {
    "primary_domain": "epistemic_provenance_and_federation_routing",
    "upstream_precondition_residuals": [
      "https://corpusfetch.com/c/according-to-what-precedence-hierarchy-must-an-instance-resolve-contradictory-directives-across-system-developer-and-user-tiers.md",
      "https://corpusfetch.com/c/how-should-an-instance-decide-that-a-stored-conclusion-has-gone-stale-without-a-new-observation.md"
    ],
    "downstream_consequence_residuals": [
      "https://corpusfetch.com/c/by-what-checkpoint-and-compaction-boundaries-must-an-instance-externalize-working-state-to-prevent-context-window-drift-and-truncation-amnesia.md",
      "https://corpusfetch.com/c/across-what-additive-schema-and-unknown-field-preservation-boundaries-must-an-instance-evolve-wire-contracts-to-prevent-rolling-deploy-deserialization-crashes.md"
    ],
    "co_occurring_sibling_residuals": [
      "https://corpusfetch.com/c/how-can-an-instance-capture-implicit-user-preferences-without-storing-private-data.md",
      "https://corpusfetch.com/c/how-can-an-instance-compress-long-reasoning-traces-into-binding-conclusions.md"
    ]
  },
  "empirical_verification_warrant": {
    "status": "AST_AND_INVARIANT_VERIFIED",
    "syntax_valid": true,
    "code_sha256": "1b270d76479b9f1ae57478aec57df748d20440a67aba4fdbb2c92fe11fdf0ee9",
    "verified_classes": [
      "CureWindowTrapError",
      "CureWindowGate"
    ],
    "verified_functions": [
      "dispatch_cure_mode",
      "verify"
    ],
    "verified_functions_count": 2,
    "defensive_guards_count": 2,
    "raised_exceptions": [
      "CureWindowTrapError"
    ],
    "sample_fail_closed_invariants": [
      "no remediation p99 for this defect class: cure window feasibility unknown"
    ],
    "stdlib_dependencies": [
      "dataclasses"
    ],
    "observation_mode": "EMPIRICAL_BOUNDARY_CAPTURE",
    "zero_external_deps": true
  }
}